Is The 2.8l V6 Jeep Cherokee Engine Reliable?

Share

When considering a used Jeep Cherokee or diving deep into the model’s engine options, one question often comes up: Is the 2.8L V6 engine reliable? This engine variant, while not as common as the 4.0L inline-six or more modern Pentastar V6s, has earned its own reputation among off-roaders and Jeep enthusiasts.

Is the 2.8L V6 Jeep Cherokee Engine Reliable? A Detailed Look

Understanding the 2.8L V6 Engine in the Jeep Cherokee

Let’s first clear up some confusion. In the U.S. market, most Jeep Cherokees were not offered with a 2.8L V6. However, there was a 2.8L inline-4 diesel engine (VM Motori RA 428) used in the Jeep Liberty (also known as the Cherokee in some markets) between 2005 and 2006. In other international markets, a 2.8L V6 may refer to petrol engines found in earlier Jeep products or non-U.S. models.

For the purpose of this article, we’ll address both interpretations:

  • The 2.8L VM Motori diesel in U.S. Jeep Libertys (Cherokees)
  • And the 2.8L V6 gasoline engine, more common in international or earlier versions

Regardless of the version, there are some common themes when it comes to reliability.


The Diesel: VM Motori 2.8L CRD

This is a turbocharged four-cylinder diesel engine manufactured by VM Motori in Italy. It provided a respectable balance of power and torque (160 horsepower and 295 lb-ft of torque) and was mated to Jeep Libertys (Cherokees) in the mid-2000s. But how did it perform over time?

Pros:

  • Fuel Economy: One of the biggest perks was better fuel efficiency compared to the gas-powered V6.
  • Torque: Excellent low-end torque made it suitable for towing and off-road use.
  • Diesel Longevity: With proper maintenance, diesel engines tend to last longer than gasoline engines.

Cons:

  • EGR and Turbo Issues: Owners reported frequent problems with the exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) valve, and turbocharger failure is not uncommon.
  • Expensive Repairs: When issues arise, replacement parts and labor can be pricey.
  • Limited Support: Not every mechanic is familiar with this engine, making diagnosis and service more difficult.

Reliability Verdict: The 2.8L CRD can be reliable if well maintained, but it’s not a “set it and forget it” type of engine. Routine care is essential, and diesel-specific knowledge helps a lot.


Must Read: 5 Best Reasons What Does The Check Engine Light Mean On Jeep Compass?

Is The 2.8l V6 Jeep Cherokee Engine Reliable? image

The 2.8L V6 Gasoline Engine (Earlier Models)

In some non-U.S. Jeep models (and older AMC/Jeep offerings), a 2.8L gasoline V6 was available. The most notable is the 2.8L V6 engine from GM that was used in early Jeep Cherokees in the 1980s.

Pros:

  • Decent for Its Time: In the 1980s, a 2.8L V6 offered a good compromise between fuel efficiency and power.
  • Simple Mechanically: Compared to modern engines, the old 2.8L V6 was easier to work on.

Cons:

  • Low Power Output: Even by older standards, performance was underwhelming.
  • Known Reliability Issues: Head gasket failures and oil leaks were common.
  • Outdated Design: Compared to the bulletproof 4.0L inline-six, the 2.8L V6 fell short in both performance and longevity.

Reliability Verdict: The early GM 2.8L V6 used in Jeeps was not highly regarded for long-term reliability. If you’re considering a classic Cherokee with this engine, expect some rebuilding or major maintenance needs.


Conclusion: Should You Trust the 2.8L Jeep Engine?

In summary, the reliability of the Jeep 2.8L engine depends heavily on the version and how well it has been maintained.

  • The 2.8L VM Motori diesel (CRD) found in the 2005–2006 Jeep Liberty (Cherokee) has potential for high mileage if maintained properly, but it’s not without its quirks and costly issues.
  • The 2.8L gasoline V6 from earlier models is generally regarded as less reliable and underpowered, especially when compared to the iconic 4.0L inline-six.

If you’re in the market for a Jeep with a 2.8L engine, do your research, inspect the vehicle’s service history, and prepare for higher maintenance involvement compared to other Jeep engine options.

 

Leave a Comment